"Positif between amateurism and professionalism : a review battling with its identity. Created in 1952 by young cinema lover students,
Positif
straightaway presented as an amateur review in al senses : the writers
were unpaid, avid film-goers, but also in a way amateurish, as they
claimed a subjective and non-theoretic approach of criticism. But if the
context of the 50’s, when cinema was a widespread passion, authorized
such a review, which was quite a fanzine, to live, and even develop, the
staff quickly realized they had to adapt to the transformations of the
field. Indeed, in the 70’s and 80’s, it evolved to an increased
professionalism, in order to compensate for the collapse of the
audience. But how could a review that founded its identity on
amateurism, manage to follow such an evolution without losing its
stances?
Positif found itself in a
very uncomfortable situation, partially adapting its practices – to more
professionalism – while holding, in the discourses, its positions on a
coherence with its original identity, that is the commitments that
permitted its recognition in the field. The analysis tries to bring out
the mechanisms that particularly hampered
Positif, while the rest of the field transformed without any major problem."
Follow the link to read Anne-Laure Brion's great French essay
Positif entre amateurisme et professionnalisme : une revue aux prises avec son identité.
No comments:
Post a Comment