The French film critics
include Jean Douchet, Serge Daney, Dominique Païni, Pascal Bonitzer, Serge
Toubiana, Serge Le Péron, Danièle Dubroux, Yann Lardeau, Charles Tesson, Jean
Narboni, Alain Bergala, Olivier Assayas, Michel Chion, Michel Mardore,
Alexandre Astruc, Patrice Rollet, Pascal Kané, Noël Simsolo, Jean A. Gili,
Jean-François Rauger, André S. Labarthe, Sébastien Bénédict, Jean-Sébastien
Chauvin, Jean-Philippe Tessé, Jean-Pierre Rehm, and Michel Mourlet.
Cinématons are
three-and-a-half minute screen tests that are shot in close-ups on a static
camera with Super 8 film. Courant started making them in 1978 and since then on
average has been making around 100 of them a year. The best period for them is
the Eighties. First off for purely its visual pleasures: the anachronistic
charms of the seeing the period details, the level of creativity in its
participants, and for the heightened colors and the grainy texture of its film
stock. Secondly for what is at stake in the project and the interesting people
that decide to participate. The filmmakers that participate are the more political
and challenging directors. While the many Cahiers
critics that show up allows one to put a face to the writers of the time. They are also all be in their prime.
But there are more than just these two groups that are being documented. The Cinématons' near 3000 extended subjects, though principally from film, also include people from a wide variety of fields, backgrounds and nationalities. But a running constant throughout them is a creative personality. There are philosophers, writers and photographers. The actor ones are really good especially those in their early career by Sandrine Bonnaire, Laszlo Szabo, Julie Delpy, and Mathieu Amalric.
By filming these individuals there is something more than just their physical presence that's being caught. There is something that comes across between the lines. And that is two-fold: thought and life. By filming Straub or Garrel or Daney there is a certain idea of cinema that is reflected in their practices which is communicated by their presence. It is this ability to capture and incarnate such rich film thinkers and practitioners that make these Cinématons so rich.
But if this was solely their reason of interest they would at best be just a footnote to film history. What truly makes them more universal than this is how they are able to catch something else that is happening between its images. An ephemeral moment of life is being documented: there are people standing in places who are being themselves - public persona's bleed into private selves. A fleeting observation can last forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment